Posts filed under ‘Medicare’

Challenge to Medicare: Don’t Require People to Get Better to Get Coverage and Care

On January 18th, the Center for Medicare Advocacy, with co-counsel Vermont Legal Aid, filed a national class action law suit in federal district court to eliminate Medicare’s long-standing practice of denying coverage and access to care for people who are not going to improve, or improve sufficiently, or improve quickly enough.

This inappropriate “Improvement Standard” keeps people with long-term and chronic conditions from obtaining medically necessary health care and therapeutic services such as nursing, physical, occupational, and speech therapy. That is what happened to the lead plaintinff, Glenda Jimmo.

Ms. Jimmo, a 71-year-old resident of Vermont, was denied Medicare coverage for home health nursing and aide services on the grounds that she was stable despite the fact that she had diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, on-going circulatory problems, skin lesions, and is legally blind and has a below-the-knee amputation.

The lawsuit, Jimmo vs. Sebelius, No. 5:11-cv-17 (D. Vt.), was filed in Vermont federal court on behalf of five individual Medicare beneficiaries from Vermont, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Maine, and five organizations, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Parkinson’s Action Network, Paralyzed Veterans of America, National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The federal government has 60 days to file it’s Answer to the lawsuit.

Improvement is NOT a legal standard upon which to determine eligibility for Medicare coverage. The Center for Medicare Advocacy hopes the Jimmo case will eliminate this harmful policy and practice once and for all.

January 24, 2011 at 5:03 pm Leave a comment

Health Care Reform: A Family Value – Support it!

While some work to repeal Health Care Reform, others are already benefiting from its provisions.

People who have already benefited from health reform are at both ends of the age spectrum. Young and old, they reflect the family value of the law, particularly given these tough economic times when jobs are lost, unavailable, and employers are increasingly dropping benefits.

Here are some stories the Center for Medicare Advocacy has heard in just the last day:

1. A Connecticut State Health Insurance and Assistance Program (SHIP) counselor writes: “I know a lot of our seniors will benefit from the government slowly getting rid of the Donut Hole in prescription drug coverage.” This is echoed by many others including:
• An older Connecticut woman and her niece, from Delaware, both went into the Donut Hole in 2010 and both received $250 as a result of health care reform to help out.
• A gentleman from Florida reached the Donut Hole in both 2009 and 2010, and expects to do so again in 2011. He appreciated the $250 help in 2010 and, given his heart and other health problems, he will certainly benefit from health reform’s 50% discount on Brand name drugs in 2011.

2. Another individual writes:
• “I have a sister who is 25 years old and was unable to find a job that would provide health care coverage due to the economy. She has very serious ear problems and required two major surgeries to replace her ear drum in both ears. If she was not able to be on our parents’ health insurance plan, she would not have been able to afford the surgeries and would have gone completely deaf. It is very difficult to be a young person out of college during these times. Even if you can find a job, it is very difficult to find a full time job with health benefits. I consider myself extremely lucky that I did find a job with benefits, but do know many who had no health insurance for some time. These young people need the cushion of being on their parents’ insurance until 26 when they can find a stable job with health benefits because in this economy, less and less employers are offering benefits to young people.”

The importance of health reform allowing young adults to obtain coverage on their parent’s health insurance plan is reiterated by another individual:

• “ I can personally speak for the kids 26 and under part of this. I have two kids under 26. One does not live at home. He is 22 and working at a job without health insurance. He would have no health insurance without being able to stay on my insurance. He was able to have an expensive blood test to find out if he has a potentially life threatening blood disorder because he had my health insurance to cover it.”

3. Four of the Center for Medicare Advocacy’s own employees have young adult children who have lost their jobs or are employed, but their employers do not provide health insurance. Again, these young people only have health insurance as a result of health care reform which allows them to be covered by the Center’s health insurance. At least one of these young adults has an on-going mix of mental health and medical problems that require on-going health care.

Health care reform is helping families struggling to deal with illnesses, age, unemployment, and underemployment. The law advances family values.

January 4, 2011 at 6:48 pm Leave a comment

What is a Quality Medicare Advantage Health Plan?

It’s open enrollment season again, and Medicare beneficiaries and their families are barraged with mail, TV and radio commercials, and print ads describing the Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan (PDP) options in their area. This year, Congress and Medicare would like people to consider the quality ratings of plans when making their choice for 2011. Beneficiaries can find quality information about plans on the Medicare Plan Finder tool. Plans are evaluated on a 5-star rating system that looks at medical care as well as customer relations, including complying with CMS rules about marketing and about appeals.

Quality ratings are so important that the new health reform law, the Affordable Care Act, awards quality bonuses, starting in 2012, to all Medicare Advantage plans if they score at least 4 out of 5 stars on the Medicare 5-star rating system. Quality ratings are so important that CMS, the Medicare agency, even moved up the starting date of and expanded eligibility for the quality bonus payments to Medicare Advantage plans. In fact, Medicare has created a demonstration project for 2011 that will give Medicare Advantage plans a bonus payment if they achieve 3 out of 5 stars on the star system.

But what does it mean to be rated “a high-quality Medicare Advantage Health Plan?”

Ask Arcadian Health Plans, a parent company that has been in existence since 1997, and that offers Medicare Advantage plans in 15 states. On November 17th Arcadian sent out press releases to many of the communities in which they offer Medicare Advantage plans to announce that they had been awarded the 2011 Senior Choice Gold Award by HealthMetrix Research “for excellent value among Medicare Advantage plans.” See, e.g., Southeast Community Care’s Medicare Advantage Part D Plan is Rated the #1 Value for Medicare Beneficiaries in the Roanoke Area, http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/southeast-community-cares-medicare-advantage-part-d-plan-is-rated-the-1-value-for-medicare-beneficiaries-in-the-roanoke-area-108768449.html; Texas’ Community Care’s Medicare Advantage Part D Plan Is Rated the #1 Value for Medicare Beneficiaries http://pr-usa.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=540001&Itemi.

Yet, two days later, on November 19th, CMS announced it was sanctioning Arcadian Health Plans and two other health plan sponsors and not allowing them to market or enroll new beneficiaries. Arcadian is being sanctioned for violations in marketing the plans they offer to beneficiaries. For example, Arcadian has given beneficiaries incorrect information about whether their doctor is in the plan network or whether their prescription is on the plan’s formulary. Arcadian plan agents may even have enrolled people into health plans who had not consented to, let alone known about, the enrollment. And, according to the letter CMS sent to the plan, CMS has been looking at Arcadian’s marketing activities since 2008.
See, http://op.bna.com/hl.nsf/id/bbrk-8bcule/$File/Arcadian%20Sanctions%20Letter.pdf.

If CMS is going to suggest that beneficiaries consider enrolling in particular, “highly-rated,” Medicare Advantage plans or PDPs because of the quality of coverage and services they provide, and if these plans are going to get extra bonus payments, we need to be clear about what a high quality plan is – and is not!

Perhaps Arcadian’s press releases are another example of marketing violations that should be investigated by CMS.

November 22, 2010 at 6:15 pm Leave a comment

Our NY Times Letter to the Editor – Improvement Standard Impacts Coverage and Care

The Center for Medicare Advocacy reiterates last week’s New York Times story: the Medicare Improvement Standard is an unjust danger to people in need of care!
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/08/opinion/l08medicare.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail0=y

November 8, 2010 at 8:17 pm Leave a comment

Pants on Fire!

HEALTH CARE REFORM DOES NOT CUT MEDICARE BENEFITS

Health care reform does not cut Medicare benefits. In fact, health care reform expands Medicare coverage, by eliminating cost-sharing for preventive services, adding a yearly wellness visit, limiting some cost-sharing in private Medicare plans, and closing the Part D “Donut Hole.” It also improves the solvency of the Medicare program itself.

Health care reform changes some wasteful Medicare payment policies. Some misstated reports of these changes have resulted in exaggerating public fear of cuts to Medicare benefits.

The Affordable Care Act, aka health care reform, achieves savings in the Medicare program through a series of payment reforms, service delivery innovations, and increased efforts to reduce fraud, waste, and abuse. The actual projected reduction in Medicare spending is $428 billion over 10 years, after $105 billion in new Medicare spending is taken into consideration. These projections actually extend the life of the Medicare trust fund by about a decade. None of the payment reforms affect Medicare’s guaranteed benefit packages. Indeed, the law specifically states that the guaranteed benefits in Medicare Part A and Part B will not be reduced or eliminated as a result of changes to the Medicare program.

Health Care Reform Rolls Back The Privatization of Medicare.

Most of the new law’s Medicare “cuts” are actually reductions in subsidies to private Medicare plans, which were begun in 2003 during the Bush Administration. These overpayments to private insurance companies, (known as “Medicare Advnatage” plans) will account for about $130 billion in Medicare savings over 10 years. Medicare Advantage plans are offered by private insurance companies that contract with the government to provide Medicare for people who choose to enroll in a private plan. By law these plans must provide all of the guaranteed benefits under Part A and Part B.

Under the funding mechanism in effect before enactment of the Affordable Care Act, Medicare Advantage plans were paid, on average, about 13% more than the traditional Medicare program to provide the same coverage. These extra payments resulted in Medicare Part B premiums being $3.35 higher per month for all beneficiaries in 2009, and resulted in the federal government (and taxpayers) spending $14 billion more than would have been necessary, if Medicare Advantage enrollees had remained in the traditional Medicare program.

The Affordable Care Act will end these wasteful overpayments by phasing in reductions in Medicare Advantage payments, starting with a payment freeze in 2011. Medicare Advantage payments will be based on national county benchmarks, with plans being paid a fixed percentage of traditional Medicare costs. As a result of this payment formula, plans in some lower-paid counties, generally rural and suburban areas, will continue to receive payments that exceed the traditional Medicare amount, while plans in higher paid counties, many of them large cities, may see substantial reductions. Rebates (an amount plans receive if they bid less than the county benchmark) will also be reduced. The new payment structure also provides for an increase in payments by up to 5% for plans that receive four or more stars for high quality on the CMS star rating system.

Health care reform cuts wasteful payments put in place to encourage private Medicare. Health care reform increases benefits for all people with Medicare, decreases Medicare costs for beneficiaries and taxpayers, and extends the life of the Medicare program.

Health care reform is good for Medicare. Pass it on!

October 28, 2010 at 9:51 pm Leave a comment

The New York Times Features CMA’s Judith Stein in Its Coverage of Looming Medicare Enrollment Period

Judith Stein, right, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, with Jocelyne Watrous, a beneficiary consultant. Many private insurers this year are consolidating their Medicare offerings and discontinuing some plans.

From The New York Times:

Medicare enrollment season is approaching, and many experts say they believe it promises to be a turbulent one — “a perfect storm,” said Paul Gada of Allsup, a provider of Medicare plan selection services.

Why? In some areas, there will be dozens, even hundreds, of coverage options. The choices must be reviewed not just by current enrollees and a crush of baby boomers newly eligible for the government-run insurance program, but also by millions of people helping older beneficiaries.

All of them must navigate a system that is changing rapidly, in part because of requirements imposed by the new health care law. “It’s a complicated year for Medicare beneficiaries,” said Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, a nonprofit group that helps Medicare beneficiaries.

To help simplify the process, you’ll first need a quick rundown of exactly what Medicare entails.

Read the full article, here.

October 1, 2010 at 7:53 pm Leave a comment

Medicare Trustees Attribute Increased Medicare Solvency to Health Reform

The Medicare Trustees issued their annual report today on the program’s financial status. Good news! As a result of health care reform, the Medicare Trust Fund is now expected to remain solvent until 2029 – twelve years longer than the Trustees projected last year. As the Trustees state in their Report, “Nearly all of this improvement … is due to ACA [Affordable Care Act].”  While challenges lie ahead, if health reform is fully implemented Medicare has a rosier future and people can count on Medicare being there for them as they age.

Medicare and Medicare beneficiaries, current and future, will benefit from health reform. Now, let’s help get it implemented!

For the full report go to: http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2010/August/05/medicare-trustees-report.aspx

August 5, 2010 at 8:51 pm Leave a comment

Medicare’s 45th Anniversary: Promise Kept and Promises to Keep

July 30th marks the 45th anniversary of Medicare. When President Johnson signed the Medicare program into law in 1965, he ushered in an era of better health and financial security for older Americans and their families. Medicare did what private insurance failed to do – provide health coverage for people age 65 and older. Over the years Medicare was expanded to cover other people not popular with private insurance: people with disabilities, End Stage Renal Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease). Today, 47 million older and disabled people receive health insurance and access to health care through Medicare.

In 2010, when President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) into law (also known as the health care reform law), he helped ensure a brighter financial future for Medicare, better coverage for beneficiaries, and reduced costs for beneficiaries and taxpayers.  Health care reform will extend the solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund by about twelve years, add preventive benefits without cost-sharing for beneficiaries, and improve the Part D prescription drug program. It will likely result in reduced Part B premiums for most beneficiaries.  Health care reform will also slow the privatization of Medicare that over the past decade has added costs without corresponding benefit. In 2010, therefore, it’s particularly important to remember and celebrate the effect that Medicare has had on this country, and its importance to the daily lives of millions of Americans.

We forget what it was like before Medicare (and Social Security and Medicaid). Before Medicare, half of all older people had no insurance. Private insurance companies did not want to cover this population because of their age and chronic conditions. When health insurance was available, many older people could not afford it. In 1965, 25% of Medicare beneficiaries lived in poverty.  Medicare has enhanced the health and financial security of older people and their families; they no longer have to worry about paying for catastrophic medical costs.  Because of Medicare, virtually all Americans age 65 or older are insured.

Medicare has had a remarkably broad, positive impact on the country’s well-being in so many ways. Did you know, for example, that by refusing to pay for care at segregated facilities, Medicare helped desegregate hospitals and other health care institutions?

Today, traditional Medicare continues to be one of the most flexible health insurance programs available. The program covers care provided by a broad array of doctors, hospitals, home health agencies and other health care providers. The 75% of Medicare beneficiaries who are currently in the traditional Medicare program can choose virtually any doctor, hospital, or other provider that accepts Medicare, anywhere in the country.

Further, unlike people who receive health insurance through private insurance coverage, Medicare beneficiaries don’t have to worry about having their health insurance rescinded if they become sick or file “too many” claims. Nor will Medicare exclude coverage based on a pre-existing condition or impose annual or life-time payment caps.

It’s no wonder that Medicare is very popular with the people it serves. In fact, Medicare beneficiaries rate their satisfaction with Medicare much higher than workers with employer-sponsored insurance rate their health care coverage, citing access to providers in particular.[1]

Despite Medicare’s success, however, it faces serious challenges and threats – some real, some imagined, some imposed. The increased role of Medicare private plans during the last decade took a toll on Medicare’s well-being. Private plans were paid approximately 14% more on average than traditional Medicare would have been paid to cover the same services. Fortunately, these overpayments will be gradually turned back, pursuant to the health care reform law, resulting in adding about twelve years to the solvency of the Medicare Trust Fund.

Some policy-makers, however, including the bipartisan National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, are focused on reducing the federal deficit by limiting programs such as Medicare.  Others continue to call for turning Medicare into a voucher program, or increasing the age of eligibility, or continuing to income-base benefits  cost-sharing. These approaches threaten the promise of Medicare as a  program providing stable, uniform coverage to all its beneficiaries.

Indeed, Medicare’s future as a public social insurance program with a uniform benefit and cost-sharing system has been whittled away during the last ten years.  Medicare private plans (known as Medicare Advantage plans) were given increased funding and more market-share during the Bush Administration.  In 2003 the Part D prescription drug benefit was initiated only through private plans.   Part B and D cost-sharing mechanisms are increasingly based on the individual’s income.  All this has eroded the single community of interest among all beneficiaries, rich, poor, healthy, or infirm, that has kept Medicare strong. 

So, while celebrating Medicare, we also urge vigilance lest we inadvertently return to the circumstances before Medicare – when so many older and disabled people could not obtain health insurance. Our goal is to keep Medicare’s promise to provide fair access to health care through a stable, unified program. In this way we can help ensure that Medicare’s 45th anniversary will mark its grand maturity, not its mid-life crisis.

_______________

Medicare’s 45th Anniversary from President Obama and HHS Secretary Sebelius:  www.Medicare.gov;  www.whitehouse.gov !


[1] Mark Blumenthal, “Who’s Afraid of Public Insurance?” National Journal (June 29, 2009) http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/mp_20090629_2600.php

July 29, 2010 at 8:30 pm 2 comments

Center for Medicare Advocacy Co-Hosts Tele-Town Hall and Local Event About Health Care Reform and Medicare With President Obama and Secretary Sebelius. Join Us on CSpan at 11am Today!

Here is a comment about today’s health care reform TeleTown Hall from the Medicare beneficiary representing the Center for Medicare Advocacy at the live Town Hall meeting:

My name is Pat Conover. I’m 69 and I have heart disease, high blood pressure, and incurable fast-growing prostate cancer. I have other chronic conditions and special concerns as a transgender person.

I’m doing the wise things to take care of myself and am still productive in several ways. One of the big reasons for my sustained good health is my primary care physician, Dr. Gail Povar. In addition to being a good doctor she is an outstanding advocate and coordinator for my sometimes complex care. She has also had to spend time advocating for me to get the kind of drugs I need, a burdensome task because I am allergic to some of the most prescribed drugs for my condition.

 I am very pleased that health care reform included many positive elements that will recruit, support, and empower more primary care physicians. I believe you and the Congress can build on your success with stage one of health care reform by saving money and improving coordination of care by reducing current programs that try to coordinate care through complex organizations. Transparency and information exchange is valuable, but care coordination is intrinsically a network kind of activity that includes attention to the idiosyncratic aspects of the health care needs of people considered one-at-a-time. You don’t need to pay for a whole football team when the basic game is archery.

 Pat Conover – Silver Spring, MD

June 8, 2010 at 2:24 pm Leave a comment

Center for Medicare Advocacy Co-Sponsors Tele-Town Hall With President Obama & Sec’y Sebelius

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

June 3, 2010


President Obama to Join Seniors for Tele-Town Hall Meeting on Affordable Care Act

WASHINGTON—On Tuesday morning, June 8, President Barack Obama will participate in a national tele-town hall meeting at the Holiday Park Multipurpose Senior Center in Wheaton, Maryland with senior citizens to discuss the Affordable Care Act and efforts to combat senior scams and fraud in advance of the first mailing of the $250 “donut hole” rebate checks.   In addition to attendees at the Senior Center, seniors across the country will be able to participate in the town hall meeting by phone.  The President will be joined at the town hall meeting by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and representatives of the following organizations:

AARP

AFL-CIO

AFSCME Retirees

Alliance for Retired Americans

American Association of Homes and Services for the Aging

American Federation of Teachers Program on Retirement and Retirees

American Postal Workers Union Retirees Department

B’nai B’rith International

Center for Medicare Advocacy, Inc.

Communications Workers of American Retiree Division

Easter Seals

Families USA

International Union of Painters & Allied Trades – IUPAT

Medicare Rights Center

National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys

National Association of Area Agencies on Aging

National Association of State Units on Aging

National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs

National Association of State Long Term Care Ombudsman Programs

The National Caucus and Center on Black Aged 

National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare

National Council on Aging

NCCNHR – The National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care

National Gay and Lesbian Task Force

OWL- The Voice of Midlife and Older Women

SEIU

Service and Advocacy for GLBT Elders

Workers United

These organizations – which together represent over 40 million seniors across the country — will be organizing satellite town hall meetings across the country to dial in and participate in the President’s event, which will be broadcast live on C-SPAN.  A detailed list of meeting locations will be released in the coming days.

June 3, 2010 at 9:12 pm Leave a comment

Older Posts Newer Posts


Health Policy Expertise

We provide effective, innovative opportunities to impact federal Medicare and health care policies and legislation in order to advance fair access to Medicare and quality health care.

Judith A. Stein, Executive Director

Contact us by email
for a free consultation,
Or call at (202) 293-5760.
Se habla español
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Feeds